Translate objective execution signals into instructor-led evaluation without displacing human judgment. The Instructor Scoring Layer supports consistent, defensible assessment while preserving human authority over final decisions.
Instructional evaluation often suffers from inconsistency, incomplete evidence, or retrospective bias. Different instructors may interpret the same execution differently, leading to disagreement, reduced trust, or unclear progression standards.
Without a shared reference point, scoring becomes subjective even when telemetry exists. This undermines after-action learning and introduces risk into readiness decisions.
The Instructor Scoring Layer provides a structured foundation for evaluation while keeping instructors firmly in control. Signals inform judgment. They do not replace it.