The event is over. The review still has to be built.

Field IQ helps training, test, and experimentation teams turn completed-event movement data into a structured, evidence-linked starting point for review.

Post-mission. Read-only. Deterministic. Traceable. Built to support evaluator judgment.

Review team examining a completed-event movement route on a large display.
THE REVIEW PROBLEM

The data may already exist. The usable review usually does not. After a training event, test, or experiment, teams may already have movement records, observations, playback, and other source material.

The harder part is lining up the records, rebuilding the sequence, checking the evidence, and turning it into something the review can use. Field IQ helps the team begin with a structured, evidence-linked first pass so more of the review can focus on what matters.

Spend less time rebuilding the event. Spend more time reviewing what matters.

Field IQ does not decide what an event means. It organizes supported post-event evidence into a repeatable, inspectable first pass so evaluators and analysts can begin from something concrete.

Diagram showing where Field IQ fits in the post-mission evaluation workflow: existing exercise data is captured, Field IQ structures post-mission findings, OCs and evaluators review evidence-backed findings for AAR and post-exercise assessment, and leadership reviews and decides. Includes note that Field IQ is post-mission only, supports evaluator judgment and mission command, does not automate grading, and does not issue operational directives.
POST-MISSION EVALUATION SUPPORT

A clear evidence layer between completed-event data and evaluator review.

Field IQ works with existing replay, GIS, reporting, and evaluator workflows. It turns supported completed-event exports into an evidence-linked starting point the review team can inspect and use.

Designed for training, test, experimentation, and post-exercise review environments.
Post-Mission and Read-Only

Works from supported completed-event movement/location records without live intervention, operational control, or alteration of the source event. Built for review after the event.

Deterministic

Supported inputs, code, configuration, and runtime produce repeatable results.

Repeatable enough to inspect and challenge.

Traceable and Human-Reviewed

Surfaced results retain a path back to supporting records and source identity.

The evaluator decides what the evidence means.

Built for review workflows where movement evidence matters.

Field IQ is currently best suited to completed events with structured, timestamped movement/location data and a real human review step afterward. That can include movement-data-rich training, AAR, test and evaluation, experimentation, and supported unmanned-system or route-based review workflows.

  • Evaluator and analyst review teams
  • Training and AAR
  • Test and evaluation
  • Experimentation
  • Supported unmanned-system and route-based test workflows
CURRENT CAPABILITIES

Start with the event that actually occurred.

Start with one completed event and a supported structured, timestamped movement/location export. Add a valid supplied historical plan or approved reference route only when plan comparison is needed.

Field IQ produces a recorded movement path, relative event sequence, concrete source and validation facts, visible limitations, and, when valid route evidence exists, neutral plan-relative geometry. Human reviewers decide what it means.

Recorded movement path with five corresponding event points aligned to a relative sequence.
Reconstruct the actual movement path

Supported path and relative event sequence

Field IQ organizes supported, timestamped movement/location records from a completed event into a stable actual-path representation and relative event sequence.

Concrete movement evidence for human review.
Layered illustration connecting a completed movement route to review records, timeline data, source evidence, and a structured output.
Topographic map illustrating a neutral comparison between a supplied route and recorded movement.
Compare actual movement to an approved route

Descriptive geometric separation, not judgment

When a valid supplied historical plan or approved reference route is available, Field IQ can calculate descriptive geometric separation between the recorded path and that continuous route.

Does not classify the result as good, bad, compliant, or noncompliant.

Illustrative evidence state

Recorded path
Available
Valid plan or reference route
Not supplied
Plan-relative result
Not produced

Missing plan evidence does not mean zero or on plan. The plan-relative result is not produced.

Abstain when evidence does not support the result

Unsupported conclusions remain unsupported

If required plan evidence is absent, plan-relative analysis does not silently become zero, on plan, or no issue.

The plan-relative result is explicitly abstained.

Evidence you can trace

A surfaced result should not be a dead end

Reviewers can inspect how a result was produced and where its supporting evidence came from.

Surfaced result to normalized observation to source record to source file identity.

Repeatable enough to challenge

The same supported inputs, code, configuration, and runtime produce the same governed result.

Determinism makes results inspectable, reproducible, and contestable.

Evidence quality stays visible

Concrete integrity, completeness, provenance, and result-support facts remain available for review.

Reviewers can inspect the evidence behind a result without relying on a generalized confidence label.

Current evidence

Field IQ has produced repeatable, traceable outputs from third-party unmanned aircraft movement data under a controlled review workflow.

START WITH ONE REAL EVALUATION

Start the review from something concrete.

Bring one completed event, one supported movement-data export, and one real review workflow. We’ll determine whether the available data and review question fit. The practical question is simple: does this give the team a better starting point for review?

1 completed event. 1 supported dataset. 1 review loop. 1 evaluator or analyst team.

Start a Field IQ Conversation

Tell us about the completed event, the available movement data, and the review question. We’ll help determine whether Field IQ fits.

Typical conversations cover AAR and review workflows, data availability, handling requirements, and evaluation scope.

Do not send raw event data through this form. We establish secure transfer and handling requirements separately when needed.

Legal Entity: Field IQ Systems LLC
UEI: TNUQSL6AP3K1
CAGE: 19P73

Message received. We’ll respond soon.
image of telephone and computer on desk (for a law firm)
Submission failed. Check required fields.
POST-MISSION EVALUATION SUPPORT, DEPLOYED WITH CARE

Frequently Asked Questions

Clear answers on capabilities, deployment, and evaluation fit.

Does Field IQ replace our existing systems?

No. Field IQ works alongside existing training, test, experimentation, and review workflows as a post-mission, read-only evidence layer. A bounded evaluation can test fit without requiring platform replacement.

Is Field IQ an AI decision system?

No. Current supported outputs are deterministic and bounded. Field IQ does not infer intent or causation, issue recommendations, or replace evaluator judgment.

Does Field IQ make decisions or replace human judgment?

No. Field IQ organizes supported evidence into a structured first pass. Interpretation, scoring, adjudication, and action remain with evaluators, analysts, instructors, or other authorized reviewers.

When is Field IQ used?

Field IQ is used after a completed event. It works from supported movement data for review and does not provide live intervention, operational control, command and control, or real-time alerting.

How does an evaluation begin?

A bounded evaluation can begin with one completed event, one supported movement-data export, one review question, and one evaluator or analyst team. Expansion follows only after fit is assessed.

What does Field IQ not do?

Field IQ is not ISR, command and control, real-time alerting, autonomous decision support, automated grading, readiness scoring, intent or causation inference, or an evaluator replacement.